Controversy Surrounds West Virginia Capitol Murals

Article Sponsored by:

Want to target the right audience? Sponsor our site and choose your specific industry to connect with a relevant audience.

What Sponsors Receive:
Prominent brand mentions across targeted, industry-focused articles
High-visibility placements that speak directly to an engaged local audience
Guaranteed coverage that maximizes exposure and reinforces your brand presence
Interested in seeing what sponsored content looks like on our platform?
Browse Examples of Sponsored News and Articles:
May’s Roofing & Contracting
Forwal Construction
NSC Clips
Real Internet Sales
Suited
Florida4Golf
Click the button below to sponsor our articles:
Mural featuring a large dog in the West Virginia State Capitol

News Summary

West Virginia’s State Capitol faces a lawsuit over murals depicting Governor Jim Justice’s dog. Plaintiffs allege violations of purchasing laws. The lawsuit seeks to void the contract and pause future work, citing a lack of transparency in the approval process. Reid-Smith’s team dismisses the suit as meritless. This case raises critical concerns about state-funded projects and legal adherence.


West Virginia State Capitol is embroiled in controversy following a lawsuit filed against cabinet secretary Randall Reid-Smith and other state officials regarding the installation of murals featuring Governor Jim Justice’s dog, Babydog. The plaintiffs, Gregory Morris and Tom Acosta, allege that the process leading to the mural’s installation violated state purchasing requirements and laws pertaining to open meetings.

The lawsuit aims to void the purchasing contract for the murals, halt payments on the project, and remove the existing murals. Additionally, the plaintiffs demand any future work on the project be paused until a fair and competitive bidding process takes place.

Reid-Smith’s legal counsel responded by filing a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, describing it as an “attention-seeking lawsuit” lacking merit. The motion contends that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated any actual harm, asserting their grievances stem from personal disagreements rather than legal infractions.

Details regarding the mural project reveal a complex history. The initial decision to add murals to the Capitol was made nearly a decade after the Capitol Building Commission approved a mural project in 2010, a project that was ultimately abandoned due to funding issues. In 2021, Reid-Smith allowed the mural project to proceed without seeking a new vote from the Capitol Building Commission.

The contract for the installation of the murals was awarded to John Canning & Co., a Connecticut-based firm that had originally won a bid in 2010. Although four murals have already been installed and unveiled, with another four in the works, the Capitol Building Commission has recently voted to ratify the project, which Reid-Smith’s team argues should render the lawsuit moot.

The controversy intensified with the inclusion of an image of Babydog in the murals, which was not part of the original designs submitted for approval. The plaintiffs argue this inclusion represents an instance of governmental influence being improperly used for personal benefit. They allege that undisclosed meetings held by a subcommittee also violate open meeting laws.

Reid-Smith stated that a committee consisting of executive branch representatives unanimously agreed to feature a dog resembling the governor’s pet, although he acknowledged that the public had not been informed about this decision-making process.

The financial aspect of the mural project has raised eyebrows, with costs already surpassing $350,000. Additional expenses are anticipated as further murals are completed. Moreover, the lawsuit points out that the original murals lacked diversity, which prompted Reid-Smith to oversee enhancements to include more varied representations.

This ongoing lawsuit and its implications have drawn attention to the processes governing state-funded projects and the ethical considerations surrounding them. As the legal proceedings unfold, the future of the mural project remains uncertain, particularly concerning the potential for a public bidding process and the project’s overall transparency.

The tension between the need for artistic expression in public spaces and adherence to legal guidelines in governmental processes will likely continue to be scrutinized as the case progresses. The outcome may have lasting implications for how similar projects are managed in the future within West Virginia and potentially beyond.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

ADD MORE INFORMATION OR CONTRIBUTE TO OUR ARTICLE CLICK HERE!
Article Sponsored by:

Want to target the right audience? Sponsor our site and choose your specific industry to connect with a relevant audience.

What Sponsors Receive:
Prominent brand mentions across targeted, industry-focused articles
High-visibility placements that speak directly to an engaged local audience
Guaranteed coverage that maximizes exposure and reinforces your brand presence
Interested in seeing what sponsored content looks like on our platform?
Browse Examples of Sponsored News and Articles:
May’s Roofing & Contracting
Forwal Construction
NSC Clips
Real Internet Sales
Suited
Florida4Golf
Click the button below to sponsor our articles:
Construction Management Software for Contractors in Novi, MI

For contractors in Novi, MI, CMiC provides a construction management software that enhances job site coordination and financial tracking. With real-time reporting and mobile accessibility, CMiC allows contractors in Novi to manage complex projects with greater precision and confidence.

Learn More about CMiC’s offerings here. 

Stay Connected

More Updates

Would You Like To Add Your Business?

Sign Up Now and get your local business listed!